Featured Customer Success Story

Officer Accessions Flow Timing Improvement

Client: United States Army

Click here to read the complete customer story in Adobe PDF format. Adobe PDF

Officer Accessions Flow
Customer Testimonial
Click here to see a customer interview video

Situation:
In 2006, the Army replaced the Cold War-era linear readiness and deployment model with ARFORGEN (Army Force Generation) a "supply-based model" that builds unit readiness over time. The Army has systems for organizing, staffing, equipping, training, deploying, sustaining, modernizing and mobilizing – however, these systems are not, in themselves, self-synchronizing.

Each year, the Army accesses (graduates and assimilates into the Army ) more than 7,000 officers from across several commissioning sources - West Point, the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC), and Officer Candidate School (OCS), to meet the national security needs of the Army and the Nation. After graduation and commissioning, each of these officers negotiates a customized training pipeline to complete their military specialty technical training. Upon completion of this training, they join their assigned unit during its current readiness cycle.

As the Army made the recent transition to the new ARFORGEN readiness model, it became evident that a greater level of precision was necessary in placing newly commissioned officers into deploying units. Due to training allocation and scheduling
business rules, there were examples of Lieutenants, assigned to lower priority units, attending specialty training well before Lieutenants assigned to higher priority units. U.S. Army Accessions Command requested development of an enterprise-level model that could highlight current process inefficiencies and facilitate "what if" analysis of revised policies or adjusted business rules.

Objectives:
U.S Army Accessions Command requested development of a model of the current officer accessions flow to both highlight the current process and facilitate exploration of the following research questions:

  • Can changes in training capacity improve key enterprise performance metrics?
  • Can adjustments to course allocations and scheduling business rules improve key enterprise performance metrics?
  • What impacts do adjustments in the accessions commissioning date profile have on key enterprise performance metrics?

Model Image

Click here to read the complete customer story in Adobe PDF format. Adobe PDF

 

In this issue
 
Newsletter Home
Product News
Training News
Academic News
Featured Customer Success Story
Upcoming Events
ProModel Home
Newsletter Archive
   

ProModel on the Web

 
 

  YouTube

 Twitter

 Linked In

 facebook

 Blog

   
Send to friend

Send To Friend

Subscribe

Unsubscribe

Copyright © 2012 ProModel Corporation, All Rights Reserved
556 East Technology Ave., Orem, UT 84097